在大學英語四級閱讀理解部分答題過程中，考生可以掌握七大答題技巧來助考。爲此本站小編爲大家介紹大學英語四級考試的閱讀理解的七大答題技巧。
答題技巧一： 詳略得當
對於大學英語四級閱讀來說，根據題目的“題眼”快速在文章中找到答案是最關鍵的，這樣我們就要在閱讀時注意詳略得當。克服精讀精益求精的習慣，做到有信息處精讀，無信息處略讀，略讀處一掃而過。
題目中數字、人名等信息(題眼)在原文中對應的部分必須詳讀。而對所要解釋或證明的觀點的細節舉例處或者通常有數個名詞的並列項，它們不是完整的主謂賓的句子，因此無法與問題對應的詳細列舉處，都可以略讀。
答題技巧二：顯性信息
查讀的信息通常是顯性信息，只要將問題在原文中進行準確定位就能得到正確答案，一般不需要做推理。
特別提示：考生對於以下一些顯性信息也應注意
(1) 表示因果關係的詞或詞組：because， reason， due to， since， so that， therefore等
(2) 表示目的關係的詞或詞組：in order to， so as to， by等
(3) 表示轉折關係的詞或詞組：but， however， yet等
(4) 表示對比關係的詞或詞組：contrary to， unlike， like等
答題技巧三：題文同序
英語四級考試的閱讀部分，問題順序與原文順序一致(有時順序不一致)，這就要求考生應該按照題目的順序依次做題。
答題技巧四：分解對應
分解對應四分法：快速將問題分解成4個部分(主A 謂B賓C+其他D)，與原文進行對比。
答題技巧五：選小不選大
四級閱讀中，問題的範圍必須小於原文範圍，反之則不選。
不能選的選項爲：
(1) 選項的信息與原文內容相反
(2) 選項將原文的意思張冠李戴
(3) 將原文中的不確定因素轉化爲確定因素
(4) 改變原文中的條件、範圍等
答題技巧六： 主賓判定
四級閱讀中，將題乾的句子進行簡單分解後，問題中的主語、賓語在原文未出現或被偷換概念，則不選。
不選的選項：
(1) 選項表述無中生有
(2) 原文中作者的目的、意圖、願望等內容在選項作爲客觀事實陳述
(3) 將原文中的特殊情況推廣爲普遍現象
(4) 將原文的內容具體化
(5) 隨意比較原文中的兩個事物
答題技巧七：相關信息準確合併
考生遇到問題時，不能只侷限在某一段裏面找答案，可以先做後面的題目，在後面的閱讀中發現還有該題的答案時，將相關信息合併後再確定答案。
英語四級閱讀理解題的答題小技巧：細節題(1)、細節題表現形式
這類題在四級考試中題量較大，佔到60%——70%的題量，可以說是四級考試成敗的關鍵這類題特點是題乾的信息比較具體，考查文章中的重要細節。如2005年1月份考題：“Free play has been introduced in some Japanese kindergartens in order to”。
本題通過“free play”，“some Japanese kindergartens”反映了原文考查對象，題幹內容比較具體，屬於細節分析。又如2005年6月份出現的題目：“What did the handball player do when he was not allowed a time out to change his gloves? ”本題handball player 是中心話題，when引導狀語從句，這兩部分明確指定了考查的細節內容，在原文中找答案十分方便。
(2)、細節題解題方法
細節題考查信息查找能力和句子的理解能力。由於考試時間非常緊張，對於考生來說，做好細節題，首先是要在原文找到相關信息。正是由於這點，我們看文章需要目的。有同學先看文章再做題，導致做題時還得回去在文章中尋找相關內容，或者乾脆憑着對文章的主觀印象匆忙求解，結果是浪費時間或者錯誤較多。建議考生先看題幹再看文章，這樣就會有方向感，目的感。所以，細節題的重要做題方法就是：先看題幹，再看原文，帶着題幹個別的特有信息或者帶着題乾的中心話題在原文定位。如“What did the handball player do when he was not allowed a time out to change his gloves? ”就可以結合handball player這個中心話題在原文找答案。
四級細節題幹有時會有比較明顯的信息，如時間數字，專有名詞，中心名詞。如2005年1月考題：What was confirmed by the Boston University Medical Center’s study?題幹中Boston University Medical Center這個專有名詞可以讓考生迅速找到考到的原文內容。如果用題幹信息在原文找答案沒有結果，可以根據題目的先後順序來確定大概範圍(除個別例外，四級細節題大體上還是按照出題的先後順序找答案的)。以2001年1月份考題爲例說明：
do pet dogs love performing tricks for their masters?
a dog has received effective obedience training, its owner____.
做24題過程中，考生可以通過performing tricks 比較容易在原文倒數第二段最後一句話定位找答案;這時，可以大膽預測，25題考最後一段內容。
(3)、細節題注意點
考生做細節題時，要注意合理但不正確的選項。很多考生在做題時，忽視了題目與原文的聯繫，憑着合理性的主觀猜想選擇答案。結果很多考生感覺做得很好，但對答案時發現錯了很多。另外，很多表示程度、範圍、頻率等的副詞或形容詞可能會導致選項錯誤，如2002年1月考題出現一個干擾選項是“keep in constant touch with the computer center”,其中的constant就是選項錯誤的關鍵。所以，細節題要求考生非常細心。
英語四級閱讀理解題型TV Linked to Lower Marks
A) The effect of television on children has been debated ever since the first sets were turned on. Now three new studies find that too much tube time can lower test scores, retard learning and even predict college performance. The reports appear in the July issue of the Archives of Pediatrics & Ado-lescent Medicine.
B) In the first report, researchers studied the effect that having a TV in a child's bedroom can have on third graders. "We looked at the household media environment in relation to academic achievementon mathematics, reading and language arts tests," said study author Dina L.G. Borzekowski, an as-sistant professor at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
C) Borzekowski and her colleague, Dr. Thomas Robinson of Stanford University, collected data on386 third graders and their parents about how much TV the children watched, the number of TV sets, computers and video game consoles in the household and where they were. They also collected data on how much time the children spent using the different media, as well as the time spent doing homework and reading. The researchers found that the media in the household, where it is and how it is used can have a profound effect on learning. "We found that the household media environment has a very close association with performance on the different test scores," Borzekowski said.
D) "A child who has a TV in his or her bedroom is likely to have a score that is eight points lower on a mathematics test compared to a child who doesn't have a TV in the bedroom," she noted. These children also scored lower on the reading and language arts tests. However, children who have ac-cess to a home computer are likely to have higher scores on each of the tests compared with children who don't have access to a home computer, Borzekowski noted.
E) The reasons why TV has this negative effect are not clear, Borzekowski said. "When there's TV in the bedroom, parents are less likely to have control over the content and the amount watched," Borzekowski said. "They are also unable to know how early or how late the set is on. This seems to be associated with kids' performance on academic tests." Borzekowski believes that content and the time the TV is on may be the primary reasons for its negative effect. "If the TV is in the family room, then parents can see the content of what children are watching," she said. "Parents can choose to sit alongside and watch, or turn the set off. A simple and straightforward, positive parenting strategy is to keep the TV out of the child's bedroom, or remove it if it's already there."
F) In the second report, Dr. Robert J. Hancox from the University of Ot ago in Dunedin, New Zealand, and colleagues found, regardless of your intelligence or social background, if you watch a lot of TV during childhood, you are a lot less likely to have a college degree by your mid-20s. In their study, the researchers followed 1,037 people born in 1972 and 1973. Every two years, between the ages of5 and 15, they were asked how much television they watched. The researchers found that those who watched the most television during these years had earned fewer degrees by the time they were 26."We found that the more television the child had watched, the more likely they were to leave school without any qualifications," Hancox said in a prepared statement. "Those who watched little television had the best chance of going on to university and earning a degree."
G) Hancox's team found that watching TV at an early age had the most effect on graduating from college. "An interesting finding was that although teenage viewing was strongly linked to leaving school without any qualifications, it was earlier childhood viewing that had the greatest impact on getting a degree," he said. "This suggests that excessive television in younger children has a long-lasting adverse effect on educational performance."
H) In the third paper, Frederick J. Zimmerman and Dr. Dimitri A. Christakis from the University of Washington report that, for very young children, watching TV can result in lower test scores in mathematics, reading recognition and reading comprehension. "We looked at how much television children watched before age 3 and then at ages 3 to 5," Zimmerman said. "We found that for children who watched a small amount of TV in the earlier years, there was co nsider able beneficial effect compared to children who watched a lot of TV."
I) For children aged 3 to 5, the effect was not as clear, Zimmerman said. "There were some beneficial effects of watching TV on reading, but no beneficial effects for math or vocabulary," he noted. "The worst pattern was to watch more than three hours of TV before age 3. Those kids had a significant disadvantage compared to the other kids." Parents should follow the American Academy of Pediatrics recommendation, which is no TV for children under 2, Zimmerman said. "Personally, I feel the cutoff should be children under 3, because there is just not any good content for children under 3."
J) One expert believes that TV can have both positive and negative effects, but it all depends on what children are watching. "Content matters," said Deborah L. Line barger, an assistant professor at the University of Pennsylvania, who co-authored an accompanying editorial. "Educational content has been found to be related to performance on school readiness tests, higher grades when they are teen-agers, whereas, non-educational content tends to be associated with lower academic performance."
K) Another expert agrees. "TV watching takes up space that could be used by more useful things," said Dr. Christopher P. Lucas, a clinical coordinator at the Early Childhood Evaluation and Treatment Program at the New York University Child Study Center. "TV is not necessarily toxic, but is some-thing that has to be done in moderation; something that balances the other needs of the child for healthy development."
L) Lucas puts the responsibility for how much TV kids watch and what they watch squarely on parents. "The amount of TV watching certainly has a link with the reduced amount of time reading or doing homework," he said. "The key is the amount of control parents have in limiting the amount of access. Get the TV out of the bedroom; be aware of what is being watched; limit the amount of TV watching."
46. According to Borzekowski, children having chances to use a family computer are likely to acquire better results on the different tests.
47. The reports issued in the Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescents Medicine find that watching too much TV leads to poor performance in school.
48. Watching more than three hours of TV before age 3 has bad effect on kids.
49. According to the second report, the chance for one to acquire a college degree depends on the amount of his TV watching during childhood.
50. In Deborah L. Lingbarger's opinion, educational content is helpful for teenagers to get better results on school readiness tests.
51. The environment of family media greatly affects children's test scores according to the first report.
52. Borzekowski believes that TV's negative effect on children's marks may mainly lie in what children watch on TV and how much time they spend on it.
53. Lucas thinks parents should take the responsibility to supervise kids' TV watching.
54. According to the recommendation from American Academy of Pediatrics, children under 2 should watch no TV.
55. Hancox thinks earlier childhood TV watching affects one's acquiring a college degree rding to Borzekowski，children having chances to use a family computer are likely to acquire better re-suits on the different ekowski發現能接觸使用家用電腦的孩子各項測試成績一般更好。
【解析】 D)。細節題。根據句中chancestouse afamily computer可將答案定位於D)段最後一句話。可是Borzekowski又說，可以使用家庭電腦的孩子比家中沒有電腦的孩子更有可能在這些科目的測試中取得更高的分數.
reports issued in the Archives of Pediatrics&Adolescents Medicine find that watching too much TV leads to poor perform ancein sch001.《兒科和青春期醫學檔案》雜誌研究發現看電視時間太長會導致學習成績差。
【解析】 A)。細節題。根據句中the Archives of Pediatrics& Adolescents Medicine可將答案定位於Al段後兩句。目前，有三項新的研究發現，看電視時間太長會導致學習成績下降，妨礙學習進步，甚至影響在大學的成績。這三項研究報告刊載在7月份的《兒科和青春期醫學檔案》雜誌上。
hing more than three hours of TV before age 3 has bad effect on kids.三歲前每天看電視三個小時以上會對孩子產生不好的影響。
【解析】I)。細節題。根據句中more than three hours of TV before age 3可將答案定位於I)段第三四句話。最糟糕的便是在3歲之前每天看3個小時以上的電視。與其他孩子相比，他們會有較大的'劣勢。
rding to the second report，the chance for one to acquire a college degree depends on the amount of his TV watching during childhood. 第二則報告顯示：一個人能否獲取大學學位取決於他少年期看電視的時間。
【解析】F)。歸納題。根據句中the chance for one to acquire a college degree可將答案定位於F)段。F段整段的中心意思就是少年期看電視越多越不容易獲得大學學位，反之亦然。
Deborah barger’s opinion，educational content is helpful for teenagers to get better results on school readiness rah barger認爲(電視上的)教育性內容可以幫助青少年在入學預備考試中取得更好的成績。
【解析】 J)。細節題。根據句中educational content可將答案定位於J)段末句。內容很重要。教育性的內容與入學預備考試的成績有關，有助於青少年取得更好的成績，而非教育性的內容則往往導致學習成績下降。
51. environment of family media greatly affects children’s test Scorcs according to the first report. 第一則報告發現，家庭媒體環境極大地影響孩子的測試成績。
【解析】C)。細節題。根據句中environment of family media可將答案定位於C)段末句。我們發現家庭媒體環境與孩子不同的測驗分數的表現有密切的關係。
ekowski believes that TV’s negative effect on children’s marks may mainly lie in what children watch on TV and how much time they spend on it.
Borzekowski認爲電視給孩子的成績帶來負面影響，原因主要在於其收看內容和時長。
【解析】E)。細節題。根據句中TV’s negative effect可將答案定位於E)段，此段整段都在探討電視負面效應的原因。其中一句尤爲點題：Borzekowskibelieves that content and the lime the"IV is on may be the primary reasons for its negative ekowski認爲電視內容和觀看的時間可能是導致電視機的負面影響的主要原因。What children watch on TV and how much time they spend on it是ent and the time的同類表述。
53?Lucas thinks parents should take the responsibility to supervise kids’TV watchin. Lucas認爲父母有責任監督孩子看電視。
【解析】 L)。細節題。根據句中parents should take the responsibility可將答案定位於L)段首句。Lucas認爲孩予看電視的時間和內容應該完全由父母負責監督。
rding to the recommendation from American Academy of Peadialrics，children under 2 should watch TV.
美國小兒科協會建議不要讓兩歲以下孩子看電視。
【解析】 I)。細節題。根據句中Amcerican Academy of Peadiatrics和under2可將答案定位於I)段倒數第二句。Zimmerman表示家長應該聽從美國小兒科學會的建議，不要讓2歲以下的孩子看電視。
ox thinks earlier childhood TV watching affects one’s acquiring a college degree most.
Hancox認爲兒童早期看電視最影響一個人能否獲取大學學位。
【解析】 G)。細節題。根據句中earlier childhood和college degree可將答案定位於G)段第二句。一項有趣的發現是，雖然少年時期看電視很可能會導致沒有畢業就離開學校，但是對能否取得學位影響最大的卻是童年時期看電視。
