託福TPO1綜合寫作材料及範文

託福TPO1綜合寫作是關於美國很多職員希望能夠改一週五天，每天八小時工作制爲四天工作制的。下面是小編整理的材料和範文，希望能幫到大家!

In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day.

However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay in　order to do so. A mandatory policy requiring companies to offer their employees the option of　working a four-day workweek for four-fifths (80 percent) of their normal pay would benefit the　economy as a whole as well as the individual companies and the employees who decided to take　the option.

在美國，職員一般執行的一週五天，每天八小時工作制。然而，很多職員希望能夠改爲四天工作制，如果能夠滿足需要可以接受薪水降低。要求企業提供薪水八成工作四天的工作方式供員工選擇對於國家整個經濟都是有好處的，同時獲益的還有個人，以及執行這個政策的公司。

The shortened workweek would increase company profits because employees would feel more　rested and alert, and as a result, they would make fewer costly errors in their work. Hiring more staff to ensure that the same amount of work would be accomplished would not result in additional payroll costs because four-day employees would only be paid 80 percent of the normal rate. In the end, companies would have fewer overworked and error-prone employees for the same money,which would increase company profits.

減少工作日會提高公司的利潤，因爲員工們會感到很輕鬆和精神，這樣他們就會在工作中較少犯那些可能會帶來損失的錯誤。爲了完成同樣的工作量將需要僱傭更多的人手，但是這不意味着需要支付更多的薪水，這是因爲四天工作日只需支付給每個員工 80%的工資。這樣，公司花同樣的錢，員工這會過於勞累和失誤連連了，這樣將會提高公司的利潤。

For the country as a whole, one of the primary benefits of offering this option to employees is that it would reduce unemployment rates. If many full-time employees started working fewer hours,some of their workload would have to be shifted to others. Thus, for every four employees who　went on an 80 percent week, a new employee could be hired at the 80 percent rate.

對於國家整體來說，給職員提供這樣的選擇選擇的好處就是可以降低失業率。如果原來全職工作的人縮短了工作時間之後，他們的部分工作就需要轉給其他的員工。這樣，如果每個員工每週都只工作 80%的時間，這樣就可以以同樣的工作時間來僱傭新員工了。

Finally, the option of a four-day workweek would be better for individual employees. Employees　who could afford a lower salary in exchange for more free time could improve the quality of their　lives by spending the extra time with their families, pursuing private interests, or enjoying leisure　activities.

最後，這種四天工作日的選擇對於員工個人來說也是有利的。那些可以接受用降低薪水來增加休息時間的員工可以提高他們的'生活質量，因爲他們有更多的時間陪家人、追求自己的興趣、以及享受一些休閒生活。

在聽力部分，我們可以預測到的就是這個四天工作制是沒有哪個方面可以從中獲益的，在聽的時候我們一定要注意那些表原因的詞彙，這樣我們才能找到重點。

Offering employees the option of a four-day workweek won ’ t affect the company profits,economic conditions or the lives of employees in the ways the reading suggests.

給僱員提供四天工作日的選擇不會像閱讀部分上所說的對企業、經濟狀況和僱員個人的生活帶來積極的影響的。

First, offering a four-day workweek will probably force companies to spend more, possibly a lot　more. Adding new workers means putting much more money into providing training and medical　benefits. Remember the costs of things like health benefits can be the same whether an employee　works four days or five. And having more employees also requires more office space and more computers. These additional costs would quickly cut into company profits.

首先，採用四小時工作制可能會對導致企業支出增加，甚至大幅增加。增加新的員工以爲這要再員工培訓和醫療保險上花費更多的錢。別忘了，無論是四天工作制還是五天工作制，每個人在諸如保健福利金方面的花費是一樣的。而新增的員工統一也需要更多的工位和更多的電腦。這些額外的支出很快就會影響到公司的利潤。

Second, with respect to overall employment, it doesn ’ t follow that once some employees choose a　four-day workweek, many more jobs will become available. Hiring new workers is costly, as I　argued a moment ago. And companies have other options. They might just choose to ask their　employees to work overtime to make up the difference. Worse, companies might raise　expectations. They might start to expect that their four-day employees can do the same amount of　work they used to do in five days. If this happens, then no additional jobs will be created and　current jobs will become more unpleasant.

第二，至於整個社會的就業問題，也不是像閱讀部分所說的，只要有僱員選擇四天工作制，就會創造更多的就業機會。鑑於我剛纔說的，僱傭新員工花費頗多，很多公司都另作選擇了。他們可能就是要求他們的員工加班已完成任務差額。甚至公司可能會提高它們對員工效率的預期。它們可能會要求改成四天工作制的員工完成過去他們五天完成的任務。如果這樣，不但沒有新的工作機會，而且現有的工作也變得不那麼令人愉快了。

Finally, while a four-day workweek offers employees more free time to invest in their personal　lives, it also presents some risks that could end up reducing their quality of life. Working a shorter week can decrease employees ’ job stability and harm their chances for advancing their careers.

Four-day employees are likely to be the first to lose their jobs during an economic downturn. They　may also be passed over for promotions because companies might prefer to have five-day　employees in management positions to ensure continuous coverage and consistent supervision for　the entire workweek.

最後，雖然四天工作日給員工更多的空閒時間去安排他們的私人生活，但是他們也會冒有一定風險，這些風險甚至可能會降低他們的生活質量。時間較短的工作制將會降低僱員工作的穩定性，同時阻礙他們事業的發展。在面臨經濟危機的時候，選擇四天工作制的員工將會首當其衝地被裁掉。同時由於公司更傾向於把管理崗給那些五天工作的員工，這樣四天工作制的員工將會錯失進行集會。企業正陽的考慮是爲了保證在整個工作週期中都有持續的管理覆蓋和持續的監督機制。

The lecturer claims that the new policy, which allows people to work four days a week instead of five, will have negative effects for companies as well as society. This claim is not in agreement with that of the reading passage, which suggests that such a policy will be beneficial.

According to the lecture, a company that allows employees to have fewer working hours is likely to hire more people to ensure that it meets normal levels of productivity. If this occurs, expenses for training and medical insurance will inevitably rise. The reading passage, by contrast, suggests that employees who enjoy more leisure time make fewer mistakes and work more efficiently, leading to increased profits for the enterprise.

The second point of difference between the lecture and the reading passage concerns the impact of the policy on the unemployment rate. The lecturer asserts that for the sake of saving money, employers might raise their expectations of 4-day employees rather than recruit more people.

Consequently, employees who work 4 days will be forced to finish what they did in 5 days previously, and no additional jobs will be created.

Finally, the lecturer argues that under the new policy, employees will experience not only decreased quality of life (as shorter working hours will translate into less pay), but also fewer chances to be promoted to supervisory positions. However, the reading passage contends that more leisure hours can create opportunities to strengthen family ties and allow employees to develop private interests, making them feel more satisfied with their lives.

The passage argues that four-day work week will benefit companies, the whole economy, and　individuals. But in the lecture, the professor holds a totally different view that no one will be　beneficial from the new work week.

Firstly, the passage says that companies will get more profits for employees can work more　effectively. However, the lecture points out that four-day workweek will lead to spend more. That　is because companies have to spend more money on training, medical benefits, office positions,even new computers.

Secondly, the passage claims that the whole economy will benefit, for the four-day workweek is a　way to reduce unemployment rates. The lecture refutes the idea completely. Admittedly, there are　more available jobs, but companies will prefer to let employees work overtime to finish them for　hiring new staff is too expensive. In addition, the companies may lift their expectation that staff　finish five-day jobs within four-day.

Thirdly, the passage suggests that individual employees can benefit from it. Though the four-day　workweek can provide more leisure time to employees, the lecture argues against the aring to five-day workers, the four-day workweek employees may be the first one to be fire　during economic depression. And they will have less chance to promotion because companies　wish that managers could be on duty every work day.