2017託福寫作真題高分範文

對於備考託福的考生來說,託福寫作是不能忽略的一部分,考生要注意平時多加練習。下面是應屆畢業生考試網小編爲大家整理的兩篇2017託福寫作真題高分範文,歡迎大家參考。

2017託福寫作真題高分範文

  2017託福寫作真題高分範文一

The listening refutes the three functions raised in the reading to explain the existence of the eye in microbes.

First, the reading holds that the eye is used for following preys. Since the microbes’ preys are usually transparent, which means their movement will cause the oscillation of light, the eye can enable the microbes to detect those and follow the prey.. However, the listening points out that there are researches proving that other closely related microbes, which have no eyes, can also follow their prey successfully. Therefore, their eyes must be for other purposes.

Second, the reading believes that the eye is used to sense the sunlight. One part of the energy source of microbes is the sun, so with the eye sensing the intensity of sunlight they can find a better place to absorb the solar energy. On the contrary, in the listening, the eye can not sense sunlight, otherwise, it will not confirm with the law of evolution. Scientists find that they are becoming less and less dependent on sunlight for energy. Compared with their ancestors, the sea-dwelling microorganism is with a much more complex eye.

Third, the reading suggests that the eye has aiming function which help microbes target the prey more accurately when they send forth something like spear to stab. However, the listening refutes that researchers find that the eye couldn’t focus quite well and can not form clear image, which means they are not able to have better accuracy at their preys when stabbing them.

  2017託福寫作真題高分範文二

The reading and listening discuss about mysterious prints reported in an English newspaper. The reading points out three hypotheses to explain the mysterious prints. Whereas, the professor totally refutes the three points presented in the passage.

Firstly, the professor rebuts the reading’s idea that this was kangaroo footprint. The professor claims that Kangaroo’s sharp and powerful claws would make deep marks during long trails. And if the footprints were left by the fleeing kangaroo, there must have been reports about this incident, but there wasn’t.

Secondly, the professor contradicts reading’s second hypothesis that it was made by hot air balloon, which can be demonstrated by the broken rope and blots. The professor mentions that there was a forest area in the way, and the hot air balloon would be entangled by tree branches and could not travel that long distance.

At last, the passage states that the whole story was invented although reported trustworthy. However, the professor explains that the report was based on reliable materials. For one thing, there’s letter from Devin who found the footprints; for another thing, newspaper office collected a lot of details about the print. Thus the report wouldn’t be invented.