共享經濟一詞也許對我們來說是一個新詞，在共享這一問題上也許我們需要更多的時間來接受。近來，有多家媒體報道，在公共場所，有相關管理人員對周邊單車進行了集中收繳，理由很簡單，亂停亂放影響了公共場所的秩序。但同時，有共享單車用戶接受在採訪時表示，隨地還車本來就是共享單車一個最大的賣點，但現實情況是，很多地方無停車點，停放就是亂停亂放。這種情況下，用戶不得不到相對較遠的地方去停車，便利性大大降低。對於這個問題，我們應該怎麼看?
Shared cycling on interpersonal credit, according to some damage to the relationship, we should not retreat in a piece called "national quality is not high, we can't afford to play" in the shell. In contrast, we should be more likely to believe in the possibility of sharing a bicycle, rejecting self-denial and rejecting the old idea that the national quality is too low.
Shared a bike like the birth of a new life, full of people good expectation and wishes, if only because they simply kill the harm of it new things, if not more damage? The birth of a new life is not a trace of pain will not produce, that his mother pain pain, but you can't kill the new born to bring joy, to change things, and even innovation, really new life will grow is a hurt, heal, eliminate harm, rather than the mother of self-denial and killing of new things.
We believe that sharing bicycle is feasible because it objectively facilitates people's life and promotes the progress of people. It should not be seen that there is a group of people breaking rules and not keeping order. Instead, it should be focused on the fact that only a handful of millions of people in this group are ruining their overall image. We believe that the sharing of bicycles is also because the national quality is steadily improving, especially in the new generation, the quality education is mentioned and mentioned again. Zhiming has become the standard of the new generation of Chinese. We have reason to believe that it is also qualified to accept such an economic form.
Complacent, do not know the actual changes of assertion is arbitrary, narrow, lack of value, is like water, admittedly, hinduists China does have some of the water pollution, and if it's self denial, give up self, self closed, give up the new things change of living water, the result is the will and can only be more and more bad. Nowadays, some people are not qualified enough to assume that all people are unqualified. When a rod is used to kill everyone, who knows what time of the "now" that the assertion is expected to be, and which one should be the time we can afford to share a bicycle and its similar sharing economy?
People always take all of original destructive, it would not have been to v chuck last sentence: "people, I love you, can you be alert", for people to be careful, but I think it is should be "people, you watch, but I love you". The trees that are confined to the dark are sure to fade away. Only the shadows are left behind, and those who face the sunshine can live to find the true taste.
We need the government and relevant enterprises to further deepen the reform. We need mutual trust and supervision between people, and we need individuals to hold their own to the bottom line. To believe in sharing is to believe in ourselves and to refuse to cling to self-denial.
共享單車依託於人與人之間的信用，針對部分人對這種關係的破壞，我們不應退縮於一塊稱爲“國民素質不高，我們玩不起”的龜殼裏。切忌因噎廢食，相反，我們更應該相信共享單車的可行，拒絕自我否定，拒絕認爲國民素質太低的陳舊觀點。
共享單車就像是一個剛誕生的生命，充滿了人們美好的期待和祝願，若僅僅因爲人們對它的傷害便乾脆抹殺新事物，豈不是更大的傷害?新生命的分娩不是一絲苦痛都不會產生的，陣痛讓母親痛苦，但不能扼殺新事物出生帶來的欣喜、改變，乃至革新，真正讓新生命成長的是遭遇傷害、痊癒，消滅傷害，而非母親的自我否定和對新生事物的扼殺。
我們相信共享單車的可行，因爲它客觀上方便着人們的生活，促進着人們的`進步，要看到的不該是有一幫人破壞規則，不守秩序;而應着眼於在這麼幾十上百萬人中只有一小撮人破壞着整體形象。我們相信共享單車，也是因爲國民素質是在穩步提升的，尤其是在新的一代人中，素質教育更是被提及又提及。知禮明讓已成爲了新一代中國人奉行的標準。我們有理由相信，同時也有資格去接受這樣一種經濟形式。
故步自封，不知實際變化的斷言是武斷、狹隘、缺乏價值的，正如同水源一般，誠然，方今中國確實有一些水面有污濁，便若是自我否定，自我放棄，自我封閉，放棄從新事物變化中汲取活的水源，結果是會且只可能是越來越壞的。現如今一部分人素質不夠，不能以偏概全地認爲所有人都不夠格。一棒子掄死了所有人，那誰又知道斷言人所期待的“現在”之後的哪一分哪一秒該是我們玩得起共享單車及其類似共享經濟的時候呢?
人總是帶着原始破壞性的，所有以纔有了伏契克臨終一句：“人們，我愛你們，可你要警惕”，讓人們小心，但是我卻認爲應該“人們，你要警惕，可我愛你們”。侷限於陰暗的樹木必將枯廋將朽，只有把陰影甩在背後，面對陽光的人才能活得出真滋味。
我們需要政府及有關企業進一步深化改革，需要人與人之間的互信和監督，也需要個人堅守底線。相信共享是相信自我，拒絕固守是拒絕自我否定。
