共享單車解決了出行最後一公里的難題。城市公共交通運輸網絡在不斷完善，人們出行更便捷，但問題是要去的地方不一定挨着地鐵站、公交站，剩下的距離打的太貴，步行嫌遠，共享單車隨停隨取的特點，正好填補這一缺口。以下是yjbys爲大家提供的共享單車的利與弊英語四級作文，希望對大家有所幫助。
On both sides of the road and the corner of Shanghai, recently many "variety" of "take out" bicycle, orange, yellow, blue, green, etc., to the city with a color, this is "Shared cycling". Under today's advocates the concept of environmental protection, the bicycle as a daily travel, convenient and environmental protection, also the last kilometer to solve city and more convenient, need not again like before saving to buy a bike again afraid thief stealing, live upstairs every day still have to carry my bike upstairs, from time to time have to bother to bother it will take. Now, just scanning the qr code, the cell phone can pay the bill, the price is inexpensive, convenient and affordable. It is said that a color represents an investment company, and it appears that there are many companies that are invested in it.
"Sharing bicycles", this is originally a benefit of the people, can thus produce the malpractice, do not know the department is not aware of, or did not do the corresponding measures and the restraints on the market? It's not going to be a blind eye.
I was just a civilian, and I could not think of it as far as I could see in the present.
1). Many on both sides of the road was not allowed to park the bike, the bike must be parked where there is a sign that I once saw a roadside didn't comply with the requirements of the park's bike is trailer towed away, but now stay there in silhouette, often also stagger, nobody tube, and on street corners, neighborhood near the tree will be "Shared cycling" (some local private bikes are mixed together to stop). Devotees thought, perhaps, is: borrow the bike, will follow the rules to borrow after return to a nearby parking lot, but reality is not so, if there is no law, it is as close to their destination, the better. In this way, when adding a colour to the same time, and the addition, the street mess elephant is not to be blocked?
2) security issues; A few days ago, I saw a couple of half-dozen children riding a car in the middle of an unwide street. There is an age limit for children to ride a bicycle on the road, and not to the provisions of the age, the home not to buy the bike, now good, has a convenient "" share a bicycle, children also convenient, now children than their parents generally tall, it is difficult to figure out to not to the age, as to the cost of borrow the car, it's needless to say, now of the children who haven't the" money "? What's more, do you have to go to the road on your bike and have some safety lessons for your kids?
Once again "salty eat radish, worry", hope is to worry, everything is ok.
上海的馬路兩側及拐角處，不久前“冒”出了許多“形形色色”的自行車，有橙色、黃色、藍色、綠色等等，給城市抹上了一道色彩，這就是“共享單車”。 在當今提倡環保理念之下，自行車作爲日常出行，即方便又環保，也爲解決城市最後一公里而添方便，不用再像以前省吃儉用買輛自行車又怕賊偷，住樓上的.每天還得把自行車扛上樓，時不時還得費心勞神擦車。現在只要掃掃二維碼，手機就能付賬，價格不貴，方便實惠。據說，一種顏色代表一個投入的公司，看來這投入的公司也不少。
“共享單車”，這本來是一件利民之事，可因而產生的弊端，不知有關部門是沒察覺到呢，還是在沒做好相應的措施及約束就投放市場?總不會是熟視無睹吧。
我只是一個平民百姓，想不了那麼遠，只能就眼前所看到的發些微不足道的聲音。
1)、亂停車;許多馬路兩側原本不允許停放自行車，自行車必須停放在有指示牌的地方，我曾經看到路邊沒遵守停放規定的自行車被拖車拖走，而現在堂而皇之停在那裏，往往還東倒西歪，卻沒人管了，以至街頭巷尾，小區裏林邊樹旁都會有“共享單車”出現(一些地方私人自行車也一起混停其中)。或許，投入者設想的是：借用單車的人，會遵守規則借用後返還到附近的停車點，可現實並不這樣，如果沒有條款約束，總歸是放在離自己目的地越近越好羅。這樣一來，原本添上一道色彩的同時，又添堵了，街頭亂象豈不堵心?
2)、安全問題;前幾天看到幾個半大不小的孩子在並不寬的馬路上騎着車追逐，惹得路旁一老伯擔心的大叫。孩子騎自行車上馬路，有年齡限制，沒有到規定的年齡，家裏不會給買自行車，現在好了，有便利的“共享單車”，孩子們也便利了，現在的孩子普遍長得比父輩們高大，很難估摸出到沒到規定年齡，至於借車的費用，那根本不用說了，現在的孩子誰還沒這“小錢”?再者，騎車上馬路，有沒有相應的措施給孩子們上上安全課?
又一次“鹹吃蘿蔔，淡操心”，希望是瞎操心，什麼都安好。
