共享單車是指企業與政府合作，在校園、地鐵站點、公交站點、居民區、商業區、公共服務區等提供自行車單車共享服務，是共享經濟的一種新形態。以下是yjbys爲大家提供的共享單車的利與弊議論，希望對大家有所幫助。
The word sharing economy may be a new word for us, and maybe we need more time to share it. Recently, a number of media reports have reported that in public places, some managers have concentrated on the surrounding bikes, for the simple reason that the chaos has affected the public order.
But at the same time, have Shared bicycle users in the interview, said car is sharing a bike everywhere one of the biggest selling point, but the reality is that many places no parking, parking is disorderly parking place. In this case, the user has to stop at a relatively far distance, and the convenience is greatly reduced.
What should we say about this? The supernormal development of new things often reveals the weak foundation.
The media have reported on the latest news about the destruction and the sharing of bicycles. From the "surge", to "pollen", sharing the bicycle to face the embarrassment of warns us: embrace Shared economy, we may not be ready, especially on cultural concept of preparation.
Sharing according to the interpretation of the economist, is refers to the "use rather than having", is under the premise that do not change the ownership of the goods share mode, its advantage is to obtain the maximum utilization of resources. This model fits with the innovative, coordinated, green, open and Shared development concept of China's current efforts. Following the trend of the trend of the first sharing of the bicycle, naturally the media is hot, capital is hot, in a short time to achieve rapid development.
The supernormal development of new things tends to expose the underlying weaknesses. The fact that sharing bicycle frequency is occupied and destroyed proves this truth.
First, the sharing of bicycles faces the embarrassment of institutional undersupport. No rules can't be square. The healthy development of the sharing cycle is inseparable from the perfect internal and external system support. From the enterprise, the sharing cycle operation company should improve the management system constantly. For example, the reward mechanism for establishing honest car and the punishment mechanism of unordered parking. From the government's point of view, the new form and the new business mode of adaptation to the development trend should be supported and standardized, active intervention, rules and regulations and supervision. To disturb the order of roads and urban management order of disorderly parking place, on the one hand, to be both convenient and two aspects of urban management benefit, provide a bicycle parking area, on the other hand, for behavior intentionally destroy, steal a bike, also want to punishment in accordance with the law, in the maintenance of the interests of the enterprise at the same time, enlarge the warning effect. Objectively speaking, in terms of media reflection, neither has done enough.
Secondly, the sharing of bicycles faces the awkwardness of the ideological and cultural foundation. Elderly men will share bicycle circle KanGuanFei, children vandalized the bicycle, this may not only is a matter of inhibited the lack of personal morals, lust, and others, but reflects our citizen accomplishment. There are some weak links and morality education. Sharing is "use, not ownership", and the premise of sharing is recognition and respect for the rights of others. The sense of right consciousness and integrity is the foundation of the idea that the sharing economy is fully developed, and the culture of culture and culture is the cultural soil of sharing economic prosperity and development. If we ignore the cultivation of ideological culture, the development of Shared economy will become the tower of sand, and the single-soldier advance of sharing bicycles will die. This is the most important problem to confront Shared cycle development.
In the face of outstanding new problems, it is not only the simple provision of national personal qualities, but also the government supervision, social supervision and other aspects. Today's focus is not just on the new thing about sharing a bicycle, but the new things that are associated with the sharing economy.
We look forward to a new life in China.
共享經濟一詞也許對我們來說是一個新詞，在共享這一問題上也許我們需要更多的時間來接受。近來，有多家媒體報道，在公共場所，有相關管理人員對周邊單車進行了集中收繳，理由很簡單，亂停亂放影響了公共場所的秩序。
但同時，有共享單車用戶接受在採訪時表示，隨地還車本來就是共享單車一個最大的賣點，但現實情況是，很多地方無停車點，停放就是亂停亂放。這種情況下，用戶不得不到相對較遠的地方去停車，便利性大大降低。
對於這個問題，我們應該怎麼看?新事物的超常規發展，往往會暴露基礎的薄弱。
媒體近日報道了多起破壞、霸佔共享單車的新聞。從“狂飆突進”，到遭遇“倒春寒”，共享單車面臨的尷尬警示我們：擁抱共享經濟，我們可能還沒有做好準備，特別是文化觀念上的準備。
按照經濟學家的解釋，共享是指“使用而非擁有”，是在不改變物品所有權前提下的分享模式，其優點在於使資源獲得最大限度的利用。這種模式與我國當前努力推行的創新、協調、綠色、開放、共享的發展理念恰相契合。順應潮流又開風氣之先的共享單車，自然而然地受媒體熱炒、資本熱捧，在短時間內取得了快速的發展。
新事物的超常規發展，往往會暴露基礎的薄弱。共享單車頻遭霸佔、破壞的事實，就印證了這個道理。
首先，共享單車面臨着制度支撐不足的尷尬。沒有規矩不成方圓。共享單車要健康發展，離不開完善的內外部的制度支撐。從企業來說，共享單車運營公司要不斷完善管理體系。比如，建立誠信用車的獎勵機制和不當用車、無序停車的懲罰機制。從政府部門來說，對於適應發展趨勢的新形式、新業態，應該扶持與規範並重，主動介入，制定規則，加強監管。對於擾亂道路秩序和城市管理秩序的亂停亂放問題，一方面要兼顧便民和城市管理兩個方面利益，提供單車停放區域，另一方面，對於故意毀壞、竊取單車的行爲，也要依法處罰，在維護企業利益的同時，放大警示效應。客觀說，從媒體反映情況來看，這兩方面做得都不夠。
其次，共享單車面臨着觀念文化基礎不牢的尷尬。大爺大媽將共享單車圈起來收看管費，孩子肆意破壞單車，這可能不單單是個別人私德缺失、私慾作祟的問題，而是反映出我們在公民素養和公德教育上還有薄弱環節。共享是“使用而非擁有”，共享的前提是對他人權利的`承認和尊重。權利意識和誠信意識，是共享經濟得以充分發展的觀念根基，法治文化和誠信文化是共享經濟繁榮發展的文化土壤。如果忽視了思想文化的土壤培育，共享經濟的發展就會成爲沙上建塔，共享單車的單兵推進就會夭折。這纔是應對共享單車發展難題最需要直面的問題。
面對突出的新問題，不僅僅是提供國民個人素質這麼簡單，更關注到政府監管、社會監督等其他方面。今日關注的重點不僅僅只是共享單車這一新事物，日後與共享經濟相關的其他新事物都會層出不窮。
我們期待中國未來的共享新生活。
