it not tyrannical，in Pascal s sense，to insist that those whoexcel in sensitivity or the ability to express compassion meritequal wealth with those who excel in qualities essential in producing wealth?
如果堅持認爲，那些擅長於 敏感 和 善於表達憐憫之心 的人，應獲取與那些擅長於在物質財富創造過程中所不可或缺的品質的人同等的物質財富，這按帕斯卡爾的意思，難道就不也是專制暴政嗎?
Waizer s argument，however deficient，does point to one ofthe most serious weak-nesses of capitalism-namely，that it brings topredominant positions in a society people who，no matter howlegitimately they have earned their material rewards，often lackthose other qualities that evoke affection or admiration.
然則，沃爾澤的論點，無論它不充分到何種地步，確實揭示了資本主義體制中最嚴重的一個弱點，即它將某一類人置於社會中的顯赫地位置，這類人無論以怎樣合法的方式獲得了其物質報償，卻常常缺乏其它那些能喚起他人受戴和欽佩的.品質。
3. The appreciation of traditional oral American Indian literature hasbeen limited，hampered by poor translations and by the difficulty，evenin the rare culturally sensitive and aesthetically satisfyingtranslation，of completely conveying the original s versestructure，tone，andsyntax.對美國印第安人傳統口頭文學的欣賞，一直被質量低劣的翻譯所限制和妨礙，並且即使是那種不可多得的既體現着文化敏感性，又在美學上令人滿意的譯作，也難以完全傳遞出原作的詩體結構、語調和句法。
